Overall the concept of spreading personal experience is related to free speech. Where do you draw the line of how much a person can post? Or what they can post about? Is there a better way to spread your experience? Is a summarizing vlog, story, or blook better then constant updates? Is Twittering about every little thing too much for people to handle? Would the responses to Ms. Jackson’s information be different? Obviously people would still be upset that she is discussion such a topic, but would as many people know about it? Is this just another way for people to become “famous”? Do you use things such as Twitter or Facebook status to keep your friends up to date on your life? Do you post every little detail about your life? Do you follow famous peoples’ blogs? Do people not make a living off of knowing every little detail about famous people? Why can we stand to hear about stars in the news but not local people? Is it the issue that we have grown up as millennials and always think we are special? We always want to self promote what we are doing to the world, do we forget to tell our parents?
Each person has a choice to watch or read what others post, would you post on something that you did not like even though you did not have to watch/read it? What gives you the right to comment on it? Would you then post a rant about that persons post on your own blog or vlog? The internet is open to all ideas and you do not have to read or believe everything that is on there. Some topics are taboo and should be treated with respect when being discussed. People have the freedom to talk about what they want, but they should do it in a classy way. Would you want to be known for an insensitive digital citizen?
Friday, December 24, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment